Sharad V. Oberoi, PhD

Visiting Scholar

The Robotics Institute

Carnegie Mellon University

 

 

Carnegie Mellon University (2007-present)

 

As a Visiting Scholar at The Robotics Institute, I am working on the following project:

ADEPT: Assessing Design Engineering Project Classes with Multi-Disciplinary Teams

 

During my PhD in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon, I have worked on a couple of related projects:

 

Group Cognition: Learning in engineering project teams

I was the lead PhD student on this NSF-funded project to address the problem of information management in engineering design projects by using computational linguistics.

I developed a research prototype to aggregate the documents and student discussion threads in project-based courses to extract an interactive concept-map based graphical representation (called DesignWebs) for navigating the project corpus.

The research has implications for design learning by allowing researchers to understand how the underlying structure of the artifact changes as the project progresses.

 

DesignWebs: Navigable webs for design document navigation

My contribution in this project relates to using noun phrases as a surrogate measure for assessing design team dynamics.

This research shows that monitoring the design vocabulary over time as it is shared across team boundaries can reveal insights about the extent of successful collaboration among the team members.

The research has implications for enhancing our understanding of how students create design knowledge and providing additional assessment metrics to instructors.

 

 

The University of Chicago (2010-11)

 

As an MA Candidate in the Social Sciences Division at UChicago, I was able to leverage my background in machine learning to address one of the hot research questions in international security studies:

“Has the population-centric counterinsurgency strategy been effective in stabilizing Iraq, and does it hold promise for Afghanistan?”

This formed the core of my MA thesis:

 

Population-centric counterinsurgency as seen through the Iraq War Logs

This research builds an assessment model for measuring the success of population-centric counterinsurgency (COIN) in Iraq by using machine learning approaches on the Iraq War Logs.

The analysis demonstrates that the COIN campaign did not succeed in achieving its goals and the US led coalition forces should focus on population-related activities.

The research has implications for the current US strategy in Afghanistan that relies on the Iraq War as a successful counterinsurgency model.

 

 

 

 

 

Last updated on April 16, 2012.

 

If you are having problems viewing this site, visit the text-only version here.